contact

people who are looking for you will find you; what about everyone else?

Any live page can catch a name search. The old assumption is that a realtor site can do nothing more. We disagree, with numbers.

the short version

  • 8 percent of buyers start the process with questions instead of homes. Among first-timers it is 16 percent.
  • Buyers rate generic real estate articles dead last. Specific local answers are what get found.
  • AI assistants cite whoever publishes checkable local data. Hardly any agent competes for those citations yet.
  • Confirming referrals is the floor for a realtor site. Being findable by strangers is the ceiling.

the assumption we are pushing against

The industry’s quiet rule for agent websites: a site is a digital business card. The only people who will ever visit are people who already have your name, so the only job is to not embarrass you when they arrive.

We made half of that case ourselves. In do you need a website as a realtor?, the numbers showed referrals dominate and the site’s first job is to survive the look-up. That argument stands. It describes the floor. The industry mistakes it for the ceiling.

the people with questions and no agent

Go back to NAR’s 2025 Profile and look at how buyers enter the process. For 8 percent of all buyers, the first step was not looking at homes or calling an agent. It was looking online for information about how home buying works. Among first-time buyers, that share doubles to 16 percent, and 38 percent of first-timers named understanding the process the most difficult part of the entire purchase.

These people cannot search for you by name. They do not know it yet. They search questions: what does closing cost, when do I need a pre-approval, is this a bad year to buy in this town. Whoever answers becomes the first professional voice in their process, before any referral gets made. And buyers rarely talk to more than one agent before choosing; we covered that math in the first article. Being first is most of the race.

why most agent content fails

The counterargument sits in the same survey. Buyers ranked real estate news or articles dead last among website features: 7 percent found them very useful, and 44 percent never used them at all.

Look at what those articles were. Syndicated market commentary. National tips lists. The same seven staging ideas on ten thousand sites. Buyers skipped them because they answer nobody’s actual question. The failure is in the filler; specific answers were never on trial. A page that says what homes actually sold for in your zip code last month, with the days-on-market to prove it, is a different species from an article titled “5 spring selling tips.”

the answers you are not cited in yet

Search is also getting wider than the search box. People now put whole questions to AI assistants and read a synthesized answer with citations. Try it with your own market: ask one what is happening in your town this quarter, and look at what it cites. The sources are whoever published specific, checkable, local answers with dates on them. In the markets we have checked, hardly any agent is competing for those citations. Being readable to those systems is pillar five of getting found.

That is the envelope we think realtor sites should be pushing. Not chasing portal traffic with borrowed inventory, which we have argued against already, but publishing the local answers that question-searchers and answer-engines are actively looking for and mostly failing to find.

what discoverable looks like

  • Neighborhood pages with current figures. Median price, pace, and what changed this quarter, for the handful of zip codes you actually work. Refreshed on a schedule, so the dates prove the site is alive.
  • Process answers priced to your county. Transfer taxes, assistance programs, what a buyer really pays at closing where you work. National articles cannot compete with a real local number.
  • The confirmation layer, intact. Everything still funnels to the three jobs from the first article. A stranger who arrives through an answer needs the same easy path to you that a referral does.

questions agents ask

is this worth it if my business runs on referrals?

Sellers are the reason to care. Per NAR, 66 percent of sellers found their agent through a referral or used one they had worked with before. The remaining third are deciding fresh, and they are deciding who gets the listing. A discoverable site is a standing bid for the most valuable undecided group in the business.

does video count as discoverable content?

Yes, and the numbers are strong: 52 percent of buyers used online video sites during their search, and 58 percent rated them very useful. Video answers the same questions in a different lane. Publish the figures underneath as text on your own site, so people, search engines, and AI systems can all cite the same page.

what should I publish first?

The question you answer most often on the phone. For first-time buyers, that is usually money: 31 percent named saving for a down payment the hardest step of the process. A page mapping every assistance program in your county, with amounts and income limits, beats any national article ever written on the subject.

Source: NAR, 2025 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, published November 2025.